Skip to main content
ImmuneCited

Efficacy of n-3 fatty acid supplementation on rheumatoid arthritis' disease activity indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Konstantinos Gkiouras, Maria G Grammatikopoulou, Ioannis Myrogiannis, Theodora Papamitsou, Eirini I Rigopoulou et al.
Meta-Analysis Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 2024 25 Zitierungen
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'immunecited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D35900212'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Studientyp
Meta-Analysis
Population
Rheumatoid arthritis patients (23 RCTs)
Intervention
Efficacy of n-3 fatty acid supplementation on rheumatoid arthritis' disease activity indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. None
Vergleichsgruppe
Placebo
Primärer Endpunkt
RA disease activity indicators (pain, joint count)
Wirkungsrichtung
Neutral
Verzerrungsrisiko
High

Abstract

Theoretical evidence and previous studies suggest that oralnutrient supplementation (ONS) with n-3 fatty acids for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has the potential to lower disease activity indicators and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) uptake. A systematic search was conducted on five databases/registries from inception until May 23, 2021 with the aim to identify randomized placebo-controlled trials comparing n-3 supplements to placebo on disease-specific outcomes. A total of 23 studies matched the criteria (PROSPERO: CRD42019137041). Pooled analyses revealed that n-3 ONS provided a small effect in reducing pain [standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.16, 95% confidence intervals (CI): -0.40 to 0.09], and tender (SMD: -0.20, 95% CI: -0.46 to 0.05) and swollen joint count (SMD: -0.10, 95% CI: -0.28 to 0.07). In sensitivity analyses, there was a small effect in the reduction of NSAIDs intake (SMD: -0.22, 95% CI: -0.90 to 0.46), and c-reactive protein was reduced only by 0.21 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.75 to 0.33). Similar findings were observed regarding other objective/subjective outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was mostly of "very low/low" quality. Overall, n-3 ONS in RA might have a limited clinical benefit. Previous findings suggesting a reduction in NSAID intake may have been biased from the inadequate blinding of interventions.

Zusammenfassung

Overall, n-3 ONS in RA might have a limited clinical benefit and the certainty of the evidence was mostly of “very low/low” quality.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers