Skip to main content
ImmuneCited

Use of Echinacea in upper respiratory tract infection.

Jamal Islam, Ramona Carter
Review Southern medical journal 2005 35 citations
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'immunecited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D15813158'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Study Type
Review
Population
Adults and children with URI
Intervention
Use of Echinacea in upper respiratory tract infection. Echinacea purpurea, E. pallida, E. angustifolia
Comparator
None
Primary Outcome
URI symptom relief
Effect Direction
Positive
Risk of Bias
Unclear

Abstract

The significant burden of upper respiratory tract infection in adults and children, coupled with a lack of specific treatment options, invites the use of alternative therapies. Echinacea is an herb widely used for the prevention or treatment of upper respiratory tract infection. This review article examines the mechanism of action, dose, and types of Echinacea used for these purposes. The principal mode of action of Echinacea is through immunostimulation. Most Echinacea studies were done in Germany, but their results are difficult to interpret because of variability of experimental parameters. Types of Echinacea commonly used are Echinacea purpurea, E pallida, and E angustifolia. Both the plant's upper parts and roots are used. For oral administration, tablets, extracts, fresh pressed juice, teas, and tinctures have been used. Though studies show a beneficial effect, clear conclusions and recommendations of Echinacea use cannot be made due to a lack of standard product, variability in dose, and variability in outcome measures. Therefore, well-designed studies with consistent standardized measures are required.

TL;DR

Though studies show a beneficial effect, clear conclusions and recommendations of Echinacea use cannot be made due to a lack of standard product, variability in dose, and variability in outcome measures; well-designed studies with consistent standardized measures are required.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers