Echinacea root extracts for the prevention of upper respiratory tract infections: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Sample Size
- 18
- Population
- general population
- Duration
- 12.0 weeks
- Intervention
- Echinacea root extracts for the prevention of upper respiratory tract infections: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. None
- Comparator
- placebo
- Primary Outcome
- measure: time until the first upper respiratory tract infection (time to event)
- Effect Direction
- Neutral
- Risk of Bias
- Moderate
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of 2 extracts of echinacea for preventing upper respiratory tract infections. DESIGN: Three-armed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Four military institutions and 1 industrial plant. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred two volunteers without acute illness at time of enrollment. INTERVENTIONS: Ethanolic extract from Echinacea purpurea roots, Echinacea angustifolia roots, or placebo, given orally for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time until the first upper respiratory tract infection (time to event). Secondary outcome measures were the number of participants with at least 1 infection, global assessment, and adverse effects. RESULTS: The time until occurrence of the first upper respiratory tract infection was 66 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 61-72 days) in the E angustifolia group, 69 days (95% CI, 64-74 days) in the E purpurea group, and 65 days (95% CI, 59-70 days) in the placebo group (P = .49). In the placebo group, 36.7% had an infection. In the treatment groups, 32.0% in the E angustifolia group (relative risk compared with placebo, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59-1.30) and 29.3% in the E purpurea group (relative risk compared with placebo, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.53-1.31) had an infection. Participants in the treatment groups believed that they had more benefit from the medication than those in the placebo group (P = .04). Adverse effects were reported by 18 subjects in the E angustifolia group, 10 in the E purpurea group, and 11 in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: In this study a prophylactic effect of the investigated echinacea extracts could not be shown. However, based on the results of this and 2 other studies, one could speculate that there might be an effect of echinacea products in the order of magnitude of 10% to 20% relative risk reduction. Future studies with much larger sample sizes would be needed to prove this effect.
TL;DR
A prophylactic effect of the investigated echinacea extracts could not be shown, but one could speculate that there might be an effect of Echinacea products in the order of magnitude of 10% to 20% relative risk reduction.
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
Annals of internal medicine · 2002
Treatment of the common cold with unrefined echinacea. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Alternative medicine review : a journal of clinical therapeutic · 2007
Colds and influenza: a review of diagnosis and conventional, botanical, and nutritional considerations.
Journal of evidence-based complementary & alternative medicine · 2017
Prevention and Treatment of Influenza, Influenza-Like Illness, and Common Cold by Herbal, Complementary, and Natural Therapies.
Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics · 2004
Efficacy of a standardized echinacea preparation (Echinilin) for the treatment of the common cold: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Primary care · 2002
Respiratory and allergic diseases: from upper respiratory tract infections to asthma.
European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019