Skip to main content
ImmuneCited

Effectiveness of glutamine and arginine in wound healing of pressure ulcers: A systematic review protocol.

Tim Torsy, Inge Tency, Dimitri Beeckman, Flore De Vylder
Other Journal of tissue viability 2024 2 Zitierungen
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'immunecited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D38448329'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Studientyp
Systematic Review
Population
Patients with pressure ulcers
Intervention
Effectiveness of glutamine and arginine in wound healing of pressure ulcers: A systematic review protocol. Arginine and glutamine supplements
Vergleichsgruppe
Standard nutrition
Primärer Endpunkt
Wound healing outcomes
Wirkungsrichtung
Mixed
Verzerrungsrisiko
Unclear

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Various nutrients play a physiological role in the healing process of pressure ulcers (PUs). Nutritional interventions include the administration of enteral nutritional supplements and formulas containing arginine, glutamine, and micronutrients. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of enteral nutritional supplements and formulas containing arginine and glutamine on wound-related outcomes. These include (1) time to healing, (2) changes in wound size, (3) local wound infection, (4) PU recurrence, and (5) PU-related pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This protocol was developed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). A search will be conducted in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL (EBSCOhost interface) and Web of Science. In addition, a manual search will be conducted to identify relevant records. Except for systematic reviews, no restrictions will be placed on the study design, the population studied or the setting. Studies that do not address PUs, in vitro studies and studies that do not report wound-related outcomes will be excluded. Study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction will be performed independently by three researchers. Depending on the extent of heterogeneity of interventions, follow-up time and populations, results will be summarised either by meta-analysis or narrative synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review to identify, evaluate and summarise the current evidence for enteral arginine and glutamine supplementation on wound-related outcomes in PUs. The review will provide a solid basis for deriving valid and clinically relevant conclusions in this area.

Zusammenfassung

This is the first systematic review to identify, evaluate and summarise the current evidence for enteral arginine and glutamine supplementation on wound-related outcomes in PUs and will provide a solid basis for deriving valid and clinically relevant conclusions.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers